Inside Iran’s presidential election and beyond
Associated PressHead-to-toe veiled Iranian women attend a polling station to vote for the presidential and municipal councils elections in Tehran, Iran, Friday, June 14, 2013. What Iran’s next president can potentially influence is the tone and tactics with world powers if stalemated nuclear talks resume at some point after a successor is picked for the firebrand President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. AP |
DOES THE ELECTION MATTER?
Yes, but not in the ways many people think. Iran’s president does
not set the country’s major policies such as the nuclear program,
relations with the West or military projects. All this falls under the
ruling clerics headed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The
president acts as the main emissary for the theocracy’s positions.
But the president is far from powerless. The post oversees
important sectors such as the economy, which needs even greater
management as Iran tried to ride out increasingly tighter sanctions over
Tehran’s nuclear program. The president also has the ear of Khamenei
and can help shape strategic policies. Much depends on their
relationship. Khamenei and Ahmadinejad had a spectacular falling out,
but a president in Khamenei’s good graces could have a significant voice
in Iranian affairs.
WILL THE OUTCOME AFFECT IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM?
It won’t have a direct effect. The president cannot make any
critical changes or concessions. Indirectly, though, the election can
have some influence.
Two main theories have been raised. One is that the election
could end the internal political bickering of the Ahmadinejad era. This
could make the ruling clerics more comfortable in making deals with the
West. A second, opposing, prediction is that a seamless front between
the ruling clerics and the new president could embolden Iran to take an
even more hard-line approach.
The West and its allies fear Iran could be moving toward an
atomic weapon. Iran says it only seeks nuclear reactors and technology
for energy and medical applications. Iran often cites Khamenei’s
religious edict, or fatwa, denouncing nuclear arms.
HOW DOES THE ELECTION PROCESS WORK?
It’s a step-by-step process that is tightly controlled by the ruling clerics.
Candidates first registered with the Interior Ministry. It’s
essentially an open invitation. Almost anyone can toss in their name.
This year, more than 680 did. They ranged from prominent figures such as
Former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani — trying to make a comeback
after leaving office in 1997 — to obscure clerics and nonstarters such
as a 46-year-old housewife. Iran’s constitution refers to the president
using a male term, which is interpreted as prohibiting women from
serving.
Eight candidates were cleared for the ballot by the Guardian
Council, a 12-member panel that vets candidates for president and
parliament based on factors including loyalty to the Islamic system.
Surprisingly, Rafsanjani was blocked, suggesting the ruling system was
worried about his clout and ability to galvanize reformists. Two
candidates approved later dropped out of the race in efforts to
consolidate voter support behind others.
If there is no absolute winner in Friday’s election — taking more
than 50 percent of the vote — a two-candidate runoff will be held June
21.
WHO CAN VOTE?
There are more than 50 million eligible voters in a population of
about 76 million. About a third of the voters are under 30 — born after
the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Minimum voting age is 18, raised from 16
in 2007. Iranians abroad can vote in diplomatic compounds and other
polling sites.
IS IT FAIR?
A consistent criticism by the West is over the candidate-vetting
process. Also, the question of whether the final vote is accurate brings
divided opinions. Allegations of ballot rigging were at the center of
mass protests and riots in 2009 after Ahmadinejad’s disputed
re-election. Supporters of the Islamic system insist the voting is fair
and transparent, although Iran does not allow outside election
observers. Journalists are under tight restrictions on travel and
coverage of non-official events.
WHAT CHOICES DO IRANIANS HAVE THIS TIME?
Of the six candidates, nearly all are considered closely allied
with the ruling clerics. They include a former foreign minister, Ali
Akbar Velayati, Tehran Mayor Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Iran’s top
nuclear negotiator, Saeed Jalili. A former nuclear negotiator, Hasan
Rowhani, is the lone moderate in the field. His campaign has surged in
recent days with the backing of ally Rafsanjani and former reformist
President Mohammad Khatami.
ARE THERE RISKS OF POST-ELECTION UNREST AS IN 2009?
Iran’s opposition movement has been effectively dismantled by
years of crackdowns and detentions, including placing Mousavi and fellow
presidential candidate Mahdi Karroubi under house arrest in early 2011.
There appears to be little spirit for street demonstrations among even
the strong dissident factions in Iran, knowing that they would face
swift and harsh retaliation from the government. In a pre-emptive move,
Iranian authorities tightened controls on the Internet, which was used
as a main coordination tool during the 2009 protests.
No comments:
Post a Comment