Showing posts with label protests. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protests. Show all posts

Saturday, May 4, 2013

PolEco: Huge Labor Day Rally of Nagkaisa (Workers' Coalition) in Manila (from the Partido Lakas ng Masa website)


Labor_Day

More than 25,000 workers belonging to labor groups under the NAGKAISA workers coalition marched
on May 1 in Metro Manila, and thousands of workers joined rallies in cities and towns across the
Philippines. The workers demonstrated against the government's refusal to grant a wage increase.
They also demanded security of tenure, adoption of a living wage, cheaper electric rates,
promotion of labor rights in the public sector. Rally organizers claim that more workers
mobilized this year than in the previous year.

BMP National President Leody De Guzman said they hope to bolster their campaign for salary increase,
tenure security and stronger purchasing power of workers through the candidates who vowed to
make these concerns their priority when elected.

"Gusto naming palawakin ang laban. Gusto namin maghanap ng totoong kakampi sa Kongreso.
Subukan natin ang mga kandidatong ito," he said.

De Guzman said they were disappointed with President Benigno Aquino III's promise of "tuwid na
daan," a campaign pitch which he said Aquino also used among them during the last election.

"Malayong-malayo sa kanyang ipinangako nung siya'y tumakbong Pangulo ng bansa,"
the labor leader said.

For years, the labor groups have been pushing for a legislated wage increase that amounts to up
to P125 per day. They are also seeking for the realization of security of tenure bill that will
eliminate the concept of contractualization of employees. The bill was approved at the committee
level of the Lower House but never prospered since then.

The labor groups call on the government to immediately act on the rising prices of
electricity, food and other basic commodities that diminish the purchasing power of workers.
Progressive candidates who supported labor’s platform of demands were endorsed by
NAGKAISA and the demonstrators.

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/05/01/13/6-senate-bets-show-labor-day-protest?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/05/01/13/6-senate-bets-show-labor-day-protest?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter


Saturday, December 1, 2012

PolEco: Workers' Challenge on Bonifacio Day, Nov 30, 2012

Members of Partido Lakas ng Masa (PLM) Cavite Chapter, Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) Southern Tagalog, Kongreso ng Pagkakaisa ng Maralitang Lungsod (KPML) Cavite Chapter, Zone One Tondo Organization (ZOTO) GMA Chapter, and Pagkakaisa ng Manggagawa sa Transportasyon (PMT), staged a rally in GMA, Cavite on Nov 30, 2012, dubbed as "Workers' Challenge," to make a call to the senators, congressmen, governors, mayors, and all other politicians of the present government, to attend to the Filipino workers' struggles, generalized as follows:
1. Low wages and Policy of Contractualization
2. Rising Prices of Oil and Electricity
3. Housing Security

First of the struggles' workers had been bearing is the  policy of low wages and contractualization in offices/companies/factories. The Minimum Wage Law limits the wages of workers to what the Dept of Labor and Employment (DOLE) deems appropriate. The value of minimum wage differs from region to region, which is always below what a family needs for its expenses. On the other hand, the policy of Contractualization limits workers to 5 months stay only in a company, afterwhich, he/she needs to find another job in order to have a source of income, but also for another 5 months. Contractualization is a mechanism used by the capitalists to keep their cost of production low. Contractual workers don't receive the benefits given to regular workers, as provided by law. They also don't have the right to organize themselves or join a union. So the capitalists really gain a lot from that policy.

The rising costs of oil (fuel) and electricity add insult to injury. The workers are burdened by the low wages they're receiving and the quality of work, with no security of tenure, they have, but instead of giving them relief, the workers are saddled with the high costs of oil and electricity. This came into place through the free market policy of capitalists countries, which necessitates the privatization and de-regulation of all businesses. When oil and electricity prices shoots up, prices of commodities will also shoot up. Its a domino effect, because cost of fuel and electricity are always added to the cost of production of all commodities.

Another effect of the free market policy is the privatization of housing, which means that public housing projects need to be sold to private entities/capitalists, so that proceeds of the sale will go to government funds for public service. The funds always go to somewhere else and someone's pockets, as evidenced by the different scandals hounding government officials. So instead of making the housing program a public service, it's turned into a business opportunity. As in all businesses, if you can't pay, you can't stay. 

All these struggles are intertwined, as well as the demands. The various peoples' organizations (PO's) demand for security of tenure and a Living Wage (wage that can raise a family decently, which is based on the cost of living). They're also demanding the scrapping of the de-regulation and privatization policies, as obligated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other global financial institutions.

This is the challenge to all politicians and government officials. Heed the call of the workers, which comprises the 99% of the population. The challenge is in time for the birth anniversary of the great Andres Bonifacio, Filipino hero and the first revolutionary. It's also in time for the coming elections on May 2013, where "trapos" will once again court for the votes of the masses, making all kinds of promises and all kinds of gimmicks, from the endorsements of popular artists, to the promise of heaven when elected. 

This is the WORKERS' CHALLENGE !






Saturday, November 3, 2012

PolEco: Europe prepares for biggest coordinated shutdown in generation - An article from the "Anti Capitalist Initiative" website

Hurrah to the workers of the European Union. This is a big step and the first of our times. It's an anti-cuts movement for their democratic struggles for dignified living standards, pensions, unemployment benefits, and services, not just against their governments, but against the whole capitalist system. They said the austerity policy is perpetrated by the global financial community headed by the Troika of the IMF-World Bank, the EU, and the European Central Bank, which operates globally. So the logical backslash is to fight it globally also, by uniting workers of all of Europe, and eventually workers of the world !!!

Europe prepares for biggest coordinated shutdown in generation

| October 26, 2012 | 0 Comments
Workers in Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Cyprus and Malta, are set to walk out in a European-wide general strike. Toby Abse reports.
The co-ordinated general strikes in a number of European countries on Wednesday 14 November  may on one level only be a symbolic protest against the vicious austerity policies attacking  working class living standards, pensions, unemployment benefits, health services , education and other parts of the public sector all over the European Union. After all, a one day strike will not bring the system or indeed any national government crashing down – but on another level such a transnational strike is a tremendous and exciting step forward for the anti-cuts movement in Europe.

It is clearly about time that the workers’ movement started to co-ordinate its actions across national boundaries in exactly the same way as the capitalists and the politicians that represent their interests.
The notion that a European austerity offensive – that in the case of Greece, Spain and Portugal is directly linked to the demands of the Troika ( European Union/European Central Bank/ International Monetary Fund) - can be successfully fought on a purely national basis is obviously absurd.  It requires a European wide mobilisation of the working class on resolutely internationalist lines.
Even the most combative workers’ movement on the entire continent, that of Greece, which has staged general strikes on 20 days in the last few years (generally for 24 hours, occasionally for 48) has not succeeded in halting the bosses’ attacks, precisely because the  Greek capitalist class is tied to its international counterparts, who are absolutely determined that no working class, even in one of the smaller and  less populous European countries, can reverse the austerity offensive, precisely because of the example it would provide to others in similar situations.
It should be equally obvious that secessionist movements in Scotland or Catalonia will offer no way out of  austerity ; the enemy of Scottish workers is not the English and the enemy of Catalan workers is not the Castilians.
Indeed smaller national states might well offer more scope to multinational companies seeking to promote a race to the bottom, as should be obvious to anybody who has taken a close look at the SNP’s economic policies. Indeed, in the days when they openly used Ireland as a model, they made it obvious that they would offer international capital a more favourable tax regime than even the tax-lite British state.
So far trade unions in five countries are committed to participation in the European general strike on 14 November – Spain, Portugal, Greece , Cyprus and Malta. Whilst the ETUC called for a ‘ day of action and solidarity for a Social Compact for Europe’ at the meeting of its Executive Committee on 17 October, it would be wrong to see the original initiative coming from this very bureaucratic body.
It seems to have started with the biggest Portuguese union confederation, the CGPT, calling a general strike for 14 November against  the ‘exploitation and impoverishment’ of the Portuguese population in the wake of partially successful Portuguese protests that forced the Portuguese government to retreat on some aspects of its austerity policies. This then led both the two main Spanish trade union confederations Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) and the UGT in  to decide to call a general strike for the same day. The CCOO said ‘Unemployment, cuts, the impoverishment of the majority and the deterioration of public services justify a general strike’.
This co-ordinated Iberian general strike seems to have been the spark behind the decision of GSEE (General Confederation of Greek Workers) to announce their intention to come out again on 14 November on the day of the latest Greek general strike on Thursday 18 October, even if the Greek announcement came a day after the ETUC meeting.
Whilst the ETUC statement makes some reasonable points and acknowledges the Europe-wide nature of the anti-working class offensive, it romanticises the virtues of ‘the European social model’ and sows some dangerous illusions  by ‘supporting the objective of sound accounts’ or stating that  ‘fiscal consolidation has had a sharper effect than originally estimated by institutions, including the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund’, thus implying like Miliband and Balls that cuts are too deep and too fast, but not something to be totally rejected.
Moreover, it promotes the idea of ‘strikes, demonstrations, rallies and other actions’, a mix and match menu that would give excuses to trade union bureaucrats eager to avoid too serious a degree of mobilisation rather than calling for general strikes in every country in the EU. Nonetheless, from an agitational viewpoint, the ETUC day of action statement does provide a lever for putting demands on Brendan Barber and his ilk at the British TUC.
It is no longer appropriate to simply demand of the TUC that it name the day for a general strike. We should redouble our efforts to argue that if the TUC is seriously committed to investigating the practicalities of a general strike, it should go ahead and organise it on the 14 November when general strikes are taking place all over Europe against austerity policies that are remarkably similar to those of the Cameron- Clegg coalition in the UK.
After all, Len McCluskey, the leader of Unite asked the crowd in Hyde Park on Saturday 20 October if they wanted a general strike, and got a thunderous response from thousands of people shouting “yes”. He then asked for a show of hands on which the idea was overwhelmingly carried.
We must emphasise that if he is serious about all this, he should push for 14 November.
We should also put pressure on Bob Crow and the RMT to back a 14 November call; indeed, we must hope that the union’s militancy and its willingness, on occasions, to co-operate with European transport unions.
If even the most militant national trade union leaders do not heed this call, we must nonetheless, do everything we can to ensure that the 14 November mobilisation in the UK is not  reduced to a few badly publicised poorly attended lunch time rallies or some invitation only rally in the evening in Congress House. If anybody has a live industrial action ballot, they should suggest the strike be held on 14 November for example.
Let’s do all we can to bring the spirit of the European general strike to Britain’s shores.


Sunday, October 14, 2012

PolEco: PLM Picket at Supreme Court Against Cybercrime Law

PLM Picket at Supreme Court Against Cybercrime Law PDF Print E-mail
Written by Partido Lakas ng Masa   
Wednesday, 10 October 2012 12:25
123
Please click the image above to view all photos.

PLM STATEMENT ON THE CYBERCRIME ACT OF 2012

Technological developments, nay, social progress must lead to increased democratization and not to more curtailment of freedoms. The advent of the Internet and related technologies has opened a wide and free access to democratic space wherein ordinary citizens, including the oppressed workers and, in general, the laboring and propertyless masses, could participate in studying and gathering information and discussing social and political issues.

The Internet has evolved into such a powerful democratic tool that upheavals in other parts of the world were aided by the use of this cheap technology to organize netizens and gather them for collective action against oppressive governments. Such was the case in the Middle East and North Africa which saw the downfall of despotic regimes, in Europe where thousands upon thousands took to the streets against the austerity measures and in the United States where the Occupy Wall St. movement was launched against the world’s richest capitalists, or the global 1%. The graffiti “Thank you Facebook” painted on several of Tunisia’s walls during the Arab Spring sums up this modern phenomenon.

The Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 represents for the Philippines a backward step in this development. The law is replete with repressive provisions that violate democratic rights enshrined in the 1987 Constitution. It legitimizes government censorship through Sec. 19, which authorizes the Department of Justice to issue an order to restrict or block access to any content. It institutes in Sec. 12 a regime of surveillance of all system users by authorizing law enforcers to collect or record traffic data in real-time associated with specified communications. It curtails free speech with its libel provision (Sec. 4) and treatment of Internet use as an aggravating circumstance that increases penalties for crimes defined under the Revised Penal Code (Sec. 6).

With the Cybercrime Prevention Act, the Philippine government has caught on to the global trend of denying mass and social movements access to effective means for articulating their demands. Based on several studies published by the OpenNet Initiative, starting the year 2000, governments across the world realized the threat to the power structure posed by the Internet where the freest of speech is expressed. Hence, governments adopted filtering, censorship and surveillance practices in order to restrict, block or control access.

These studies show that filtering practices and policies vary widely among countries, the most notorious of which is the “Great Firewall of China”. Blocked content spans a wide range of social and political topics and governments justify their filtering by referring to one content category, such as pornography, while other content categories were also being blocked. OpenNet Initiative noted “the tendency toward ‘mission creep’ --- that is, once filtering systems were adopted for whatever reason, state authorities would be tempted to employ them to deal with other vexing public policy issues.” In the meantime, state authorities harness the Internet in a way that promotes government-friendly content.

In the Philippines, where official statistics of Filipino families that have experienced hunger rose to 21 percent or about 4.3 million in the past three months; where, according to the Commission on Audit, over 100 billion pesos were lost to corruption under Pnoy’s Daang Matuwid; where elite governance and Trapo politics dominate; where the workers and the poor masses face the constant threat of starvation, high prices of basic commodities and services, termination from jobs and demolition, the Internet provides yet another powerful venue to criticize anti-worker/, anti-poor policies, articulate progressive demands, and subject government to public scrutiny and accountability.

The Internet represents an increasingly contested space where the Philippine State seeks to close all avenues of popular challenge to elite rule and governance. It is a domain wherein conflicts between the elite who are the rulers and the majority who are ruled take place. We must not yield a single inch of our freedoms.

Repeal the Cybercrime Prevention Act now!

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Muisc & Arts: Metal Hammer » Blog Archive » Dave Mustaine: “The Government Is Destroying The US”

Metal Hammer » Blog Archive » Dave Mustaine: “The Government Is Destroying The US”

Dave Mustaine of Megadeth, a heavy metal band, speaks on the Occupy Wall Street Movement. Although shallow in analysis, this is a welcome development from a rocker who is beginning to see the real world. Other rock bands should also support the movement through free concerts, logistics provision, and help in encouraging others to join. Woodstock 1969 can always be revived, but this time, it's not anti-war, but anti capitalists.

PolEco: PLM Region IVA Celebrates Bonifacio Day

Bonifacio Day Mobilization (Nov 30, 2011) of PLM Region IV-A (with other allied organizations), for continuing the struggle of the great revolutionary Andres Bonifacio in the present day economic and political situation










Saturday, October 22, 2011

Philippines joins global ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests


Philippines joins global ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests



A COLUMN FROM THE SOCIALIST ALLIANCE OF AUSTRALIA WEBSITE
Read to be enlightened. The Filipino majority should put-up its own "OCCUPY" protest

Occupy to put human need before corporate greed

The Socialist Alliance released the following statement on October 14, 2011.
The Occupy Wall Street protest started small. But it has now become a global movement, with occupy events planned in about 1500 cities worldwide.
It’s born out of the recognition that, in country after country, ordinary people are being made to pay for an economic crisis caused by the super-rich. The 99% are being told they must surrender their livelihoods, their future, their security and their dignity to keep a broken system afloat.
In contrast, the 1% are having a wonderful crisis. The world’s biggest corporations have emerged stronger, more profitable and more powerful than ever before.
To add insult to injury, the 1% want to convince us that we, the 99%, are to blame for the crisis. They say our wages are too high and that we don’t work hard enough. They say our social security systems are not affordable and that our rights at work are should be done away with. They say our public education and health systems are not efficient and that our public services must be privatised.
The occupy movement is raising a challenge to the power of the 1%. Its strength lies in its diversity, breadth, unity and grassroots democracy.
In New York, after two weeks of discussion, the protesters agreed on a declaration that said none of our big problems can be overcome unless the 99% can unite in a movement for real democracy.
The occupy movement has spread to Australia, with protests planned to start here from October 15.
It’s true the economic situation here is not yet as dire as in the US, where the richest 400 Americans have more wealth than the poorest 150 million.
But Australia is headed in the same direction. We should not wait to protest until things get as bad as the US, Spain or Greece, where inequality reigns supreme.
Inequality in Australia is large and growing. Already, the richest 20% of Australians have 61% of the wealth. The poorest 20% have just 1% of the wealth. Australia’s richest 11 individuals have more than the poorest 800,000 households combined.
Further, there are many reasons why we should take this opportunity to start to bring Australia’s own 1% to account.
We should occupy because White Australia has occupied stolen Aboriginal land for more than two centuries. The dispossession of Aboriginal land and culture continues today with the infamous Northern Territory intervention, which is forcing Aboriginal people from their traditional homelands. Today, Aboriginal Australians are the most imprisoned people in the world. To Australia’s eternal shame, their life expectancy is still 19 years lower than other Australians.
We should occupy cities in Australia because the richest mining and energy corporations already occupy our atmosphere, pumping it full of greenhouse gases and ignoring the warnings from scientists that climate change threatens to destroy life as we know it.
We should occupy because coal seam gas and other fossil fuel companies already occupy our farmlands, our forests, our drinking water catchments and our communities. With government support, the fossil fuel industry has free reign across the country, regardless of the serious health and pollution risks.
We should occupy because the Australian military already occupies other countries, and is bringing endless war and countless civilian deaths to Afghanistan.
We should occupy because Australian governments, Liberal and Labor, have occupied Australia with refugee detention centres — modern-day concentration camps that bring immense suffering to desperate asylum seekers that deserve our help.
We should occupy because government laws already occupy our relationships, denying the right of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people to marry if they choose and making queers second-class citizens without equal rights.
We should occupy because restrictive anti-union laws already occupy our workplaces, denying the right of working people to organise to defend their rights at work.
We should occupy because governments have helped corporations occupy our public assets, turning services for the public good into profit machines for the 1%.
And we should occupy because Australia’s richest corporations already occupy our parliaments, state and federal.
The best democracy capitalism can deliver today is the right to tick a box once every few years. Between elections, corporations have open access to politicians while the rest of us are shut out, expected to bear the consequences in silence.
The 1% give millions to the big political parties each year and they demand a return on their investment. They skew the mainstream media debate in their interests because they are the mainstream media. They pour millions into cynical public relations and advertising campaigns. Corporate power over the political process is growing relentlessly.
The global 1% will not change their ways on their own account. Profit and greed are their only gods. Only the 99%, acting together, can put an end to the system of corporate rule and build something new in its place, a system that puts human need before corporate greed.
We won’t be silenced. Our power lies in our numbers. United as communities, with our unions and with each other, we can raise a challenge to corporate power.

or you can visit:  http://www.socialist-alliance.org/page.php?page=1146  for the original print

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

US tells Mubarak to step down, due to peoples' protest

Obama tells Mubarak, transition must begin 'now' - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

The US cannot do anything about Mubarak's greed to hold on to power, Egypt's ally for 30 years, due to the overwhelming peoples' protest on the streets of Cairo. The logical thing to do for Obama: order Mubarak to step down, and make a press release that the US wants peace and prosperity to overcome political turmoil, and that the youth should spearhead the economic renewal, as if this would happen with them running Egypt's economic affairs.